Like its predecessors, Modern Warfare 3 is a punchy military shooter with few rivals. It’s not a revolution, but the new zombies world spices things up.
A weak campaign with an unsatisfactory cliffhanger resolution, a Zombies map that's little more than rebranded DMZ, and a selection of multiplayer maps taken straight from Modern Warfare II (2009), Modern Warfare III barely stands up on its own merits, especially if you've thrown countless hours into last year's entry and have plenty to carry forward.
Some Players around us focusing on the rumors for views and likes on their channel, I played full game, game is really awesome on the basis :-1.) Story – 8.8/102.) Realm – 9.8/103.) Gun gameplay – 9.9/104.) Environment – 10/105.) Visual Effect – 10/106.) Sound Effect – 10/107.) Textures – 9.6/108.) Animation – 9.8/10, 9.) UI – 10/10, 10.) Art Direction – 9.9/10
From my perspective, buying the new installment doesn't make sense. It's particularly irrelevant for those who purchase Call of Duty once in a blue moon and desire a complete package, including an entertaining campaign and perhaps cooperative missions. Exhausted zombies don't salvage it. While the multiplayer is successful, the overall package leaves a bitter aftertaste.
Modern Warfare 3's multiplayer is the shining light of this year's Call of Duty offering and is without a doubt the glue holding the whole package together. Unfortunately, it's hard to ignore the glaring cracks in what should have probably been an expansion for MW2.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a low point for series. A passable multiplayer suite can't prop up the uninspired campaign, and dreadfully dull zombies mode. The series needs to take a break from the annualised release schedule, and inject some much needed creativity into the legendary franchise.
Sometimes words are not enough to describe how bad a game is. If Modern Warfare III had never been released, we could say a lot more good things about it. Call of Duty 3 gave birth to a legend like Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. We don't know what this game will lead to in the future.
Modern Warfare III feels like a content expansion for Call of Duty: Warzone, and if it were sold as that, at a lower price, it could’ve been justified. But by selling this as a premium experience, and crunching developers to create the game in just 16 months, Activision has shown its hand. This game shows that the publisher doesn’t care about its staff, and evidently, doesn’t respect its consumers.
I actually liked the game. The campaign may have felt a tad hollow but it was a beautiful shooter with incredibly fluid motion and mechanics as usual. The ending of the campaign stopped when you were the most emotionally invested which was a bit of a let down. Though you can tell they didn't want to finalize the story line quite yet.
Multi-player options are pretty vast with standard bringing back 16 old school maps that had me feeling a heavy dose of deja vu from the original series. Add on a large open world zombies map with a whole new feel of it's own, co-op missions and the epic War zone and you'll have plenty to keep you busy for the year. I say give it a shot, be open minded and experience a butter smooth FPS in 2023-24.
The only reason it's not higher is because the campaign is the worst in the series, but Modern Warfare III's multiplayer is best in years and the zombies were a pleasent surprise.
very boring zombies mode with barely any zombies and very generic surroundings. Points system is based around doing repetitive tasks and little points are gained from zombies. All my team mates kept leaving and their is no story line introduced. Basically just an empty PVE warzone.
I did like the vehicles though.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 arrives on the scene with lofty expectations, given the high standards set by its predecessors. However, the experience falls notably short of the mark, particularly in its single-player campaign and the perceived mishandling of the narrative. On the multiplayer front, while improvements are evident, the overall sentiment leans more towards a missed opportunity rather than a groundbreaking **** single-player campaign in Modern Warfare 3 has its fair share of issues, with a narrative that feels disjointed and lacking the cohesive storytelling seen in its predecessors. The campaign is notably brief, and the standout missions are a rarity. The inclusion of sections that feel like single-player variants of multiplayer maps adds to the sense that the campaign is merely a hodgepodge of disconnected experiences. This departure from the compelling narratives of the previous titles is a letdown, leaving fans of the series yearning for the engaging storytelling that characterized Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2.While one or two missions manage to capture the essence of a traditional campaign, the majority feel like disjointed sequences of running and gunning in environments that closely resemble multiplayer maps. This approach not only undermines the storytelling potential but also leaves players questioning the direction of the series. Modern Warfare 3 struggles to provide a fulfilling narrative, with plot points that feel forced and fail to deliver the emotional impact seen in its predecessors.Moreover, the multiplayer component, although showing signs of improvement, falls short of being the revolutionary leap that fans might have anticipated. The enhancements in multiplayer could have been seamlessly integrated into the existing framework of Modern Warfare 2, raising questions about the decision to market Modern Warfare 3 as a standalone title rather than a substantial update. The sense of déjà vu in the multiplayer experience dampens the excitement that typically accompanies a new installment in the **** decision to attach a full-price tag to Modern Warfare 3 becomes a contentious point, especially considering the perceived lack of innovation and the feeling that players are essentially paying a premium for what could be seen as a glorified update to Modern Warfare 2. Activision's pricing strategy, coupled with the disappointment in the single-player campaign, leaves many players questioning the value proposition of this **** conclusion, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is a mixed bag. The single-player campaign disappoints with its lackluster narrative and a departure from the engaging storytelling of its predecessors. The multiplayer, while showing signs of improvement, falls short of being the groundbreaking experience fans might have hoped for. The pricing strategy adds to the frustration, positioning Modern Warfare 3 more as an expensive update than a fully realized standalone game. The missed potential in both the single-player and multiplayer aspects leaves players with a sense of longing for the innovation and excitement that characterized the earlier entries in the series.
SummaryModern Warfare 3 delivers a multiplayer experience that continues to raise the bar by focusing on fast-paced, gun-on-gun combat, along with innovative features that support and enhance a large variety of play-styles. Killstreaks have been redesigned, new game modes are being introduced, and a gun progression system evolves your weapons o...